Ethical Views Of Kant And Nielsen - 3041 Words

The purpose of the paper is to compare ethical views of Kant and Nielsen. Both figures are quite noticeable in philosophy of ethics. The works of Kant stand out among the philosophical treatises on ethics. Kant’s ethics in many ways was the pinnacle of moral philosophy of modern times. Nielsen considered that philosophy is related to practical matters. Philosophy thinking includes abstract theorizing and practical action. Nielsen claims that morality cannot be grounded on religion, and that there is no sign to demonstrate that doubters deject or lose their feeling of individuality and objective. He stresses that the consequences of Christian absolutism are more probable to be outrageous than are those of a material ethic that integrates a†¦show more content†¦One of the merits of Kant is that he separated the questions of the existence of God, the soul, freedom – issues of theoretical reason – from the question of practical reason: what should I do? Prac tical philosophy of Kant has had a huge impact on the next generations of philosophers. Current research of Kantian ethics is an attempt to give new ways of rethinking and new approaches for Reconstruction of critical ethics. Critical Kantian ethics as its starting point is the recognition of the practice, which is embodied with rational human behaviour. Just as theoretical philosophy clarifies the question of the possibility of truth and scientific knowledge, all practical philosophy is devoted to human practice, and consideration of the ratio of real freedom and the moral law is one of the major problems of understanding the Kantian practical philosophy. According to Kant, the unity of the critical philosophy with Kant’s moral philosophy should be found in the fundamental situation of human in the world and his understanding of the unity of knowledge and to push the boundaries of behaviour. Indeed, the moral behaviour requires not only awareness of the obligation, but also a practical accomplishment. The only thing that was originally destined to a human is his pursuit of happiness; the most fundamental needs and interests of the people ultimately boil down to achieve bliss. But even if this fundamental nature of human can be distinguished from available human